- ([info]entangledbank) wrote,
@ 2004-03-05 15:36:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: creative

with Cate Blanchett as Chomsky
Someone on E2 trotted out that ridiculous slur of no-one calling for linguists in an aeroplane. Of course we lead valuable and exciting lives. Why, just at the moment I'm negotiating with some top networks for rights to the pilots of a few surefire winners I've been working on.

There's Phonetics Lab, the bittersweet tale of the trials and tribulations of idealistic young phonologist Kate Harmon as she strives with Chief Phonetician Jock Galloway. He scorns her optimality rankings as namby-pamby bureaucracy, and jabs his tobacco-stained fingers at his spectrograms. 'Formants! Transitions! These I can believe in,' he says.

Drama is one thing, but we want them to be educational too. In Semantic Street the host, Flightless Bird, talks to a group of neighbourhood children. 'What kind of thing is a BIRD?' he asks them.
'It's an ANIMAL,' says one.
'No it's not,' lisps another.
'It's something that can FLY,' a third offers.
'Do aaall BIRDs FLY?' asks Flightless Bird.
'Bats FLY too,' another youngster pipes up amid the shaking of heads.

The traditional soap opera market is catered for with Implicit Communication, the everyday story of real life conversations. John Jones and Mary Smith are an ordinary young couple. Into their life one day comes Bill, who tells John and Mary he's having a wild party that night. Mary thinks Bill intends to ask them to it, but John assumes a different meaning of wild. At the party Bill asks Mary if she likes going to the cinema. John wonders if Bill meant to ask Mary to come to the cinema with him, and tells her, 'It's getting late.' Mary tells John he left his coat in the hall. John walks away without saying a word, so Mary assumed he meant her to be able to continue talking with Bill. 'Someone's a bit miffed,' she comments.

Proto She Reconstructed is perhaps the first series to be set in the unglamorous back rooms where dead languages are painstakingly examined.

But the one that has me really excited is the action-packed adventures of the team from Command Headquarters for Overt Movement of Syntax. The working title for this series is Move Alpha.

Scene. The operations room at CHOMS. Interior. Evening.

The back wall is covered by a giant screen showing a syntactic tree. Lexical heads are picked out in green, maximal projections in blue, functional categories in yellow, features in red. In the room are Baker, Radford, and Grimshaw. Baker is the man in charge: older, cynical, crumpled. Radford is younger, sharper, and aggressive. Grimshaw is a power-suited woman under headphones. She is making notes.

GRIMSHAW: Subject's approaching the drop.

BAKER: Can we make out who it is yet?

GRIMSHAW: It's John.

Radford's brow creases.
RADFORD: I thought it would be Bill.

GRIMSHAW: Bill's in the matrix clause. He's c-commanding John. We're getting a fix on the object.

Baker stretches his finger out, waiting for the moment to arrive.

GRIMSHAW: Indirect object, we've got a... no, it's a goal. It's a party.

RADFORD: Christ, I don't fancy being a pragmatist now. He laughs, but Baker cuts him short. They wait in silence, tension-filled seconds.

GRIMSHAW: Lexical insertion complete.

Baker drops his finger sharply.

RADFORD: Move alpha!

GRIMSHAW: Embedded clause 2, move alpha. Go. Go. Go.

They track the lights moving on the giant screen.

RADFORD: Object into Spec,AgrO.

GRIMSHAW: Check.

RADFORD: Is the verb there yet?

GRIMSHAW: Not yet.

RADFORD: Damn, what's going wrong?

BAKER: Patience.

RADFORD: They've PROCRASTINATEd too long, I don't like this.

BAKER: That verb's carrying a strong feature, it'll get there.

RADFORD: It's a trap. It'll be minus Interpr--

GRIMSHAW: Verb in AgrO. Checking features.

Baker allows himself a tight, grim smile. Radford rubs the sweat from his forehead with a handkerchief.

GRIMSHAW: Verb in AgrS. Waiting for the subject. No subject.

BAKER (after a pause): Did you check the landing sites?

RADFORD: Course I checked the damned landing sites.

BAKER (placidly): Check them again.

RADFORD (exploding): Baker!

GRIMSHAW: No subject. Still waiting for subject. Object requests permission to front to Spec,CP.

RADFORD: We've got +WH features there, there, and there, nothing can go wrong. Don't tell me about landing sites. What's holding that damned subject?

BAKER: So you noticed that makes a WH-island on the CP boundary?

RADFORD: Course we... he tails off, his face stricken with doubt

GRIMSHAW: Subject in Spec,AgrS, case checked, verb checked. IP proceeding to SpellOut.

RADFORD: It's a trap! It's an embedded question! It'll crash the derivation!

BAKER: He's a professional, Radford. Watch.

RADFORD: My god, he's going for long-distance movement. He'll never make it!




(Post a new comment)


[info]berglaug
2004-03-05 08:03 am UTC (link)
*dries the tears of laughter*

i would be completely addicted to Move Alpha!

completely

it's an eeeeexcellent idea

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]entangledbank
2004-03-05 08:31 am UTC (link)
*bows* Thankee

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]berglaug
2004-03-05 08:04 am UTC (link)
oh, and phonetics lab sounds great too

(Reply to this)


[info]lallabelle
2004-03-05 08:11 am UTC (link)
Being a Rutgers student, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!

I love Professor Baker (have him for typology this semester). He *would* placidly tell you to check something again.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lallabelle
2004-03-05 08:17 am UTC (link)
Or in my case, just say "Noooooooooo...." about as nicely as possible.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]entangledbank
2004-03-05 08:33 am UTC (link)
There's that bit in the credits about *ResemblanceLiving, you know, but we do try to make it grittily realistic.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jacinthsong
2004-03-05 08:56 am UTC (link)
I would send any amount of money for Proto and Implicit Communication to get made.

(Reply to this)


[info]gruyere
2004-03-05 12:29 pm UTC (link)
Dropping in from [info]metaquotes - that's marvelous.

(Reply to this)


[info]foxfour
2004-03-05 12:38 pm UTC (link)
you have made my day. too blissful for words.

(Reply to this)


[info]hkzcowgirl
2004-03-05 01:47 pm UTC (link)
Awesome. Simply awesome. I think Proto She Reconstructed needs to be filmed at Harvard; I know exactly who the cast should be.

(Reply to this)


[info]ex_diegesis11
2004-03-05 03:49 pm UTC (link)
*tear*
that was the funniest thing EVAR! I just had either a laughing fit or a mild seizure.

I will not be able to contain the laughter when i go to baker's lecture next week. I blame *YOU* for when I fail this course, and thank you all the same.

(Reply to this)


[info]sinsofthedove
2004-03-05 03:50 pm UTC (link)
Move Alpha sounds better than anything on TV right now. High drama. Woohoo.

(Reply to this)


[info]tevriel
2004-03-05 04:23 pm UTC (link)
Hi. I'm here from metaquotes, and I think I'm in love with you.

Okay, not really, but you have no idea how I groove on all things linguistics and this is just brilliant.

(Reply to this)


[info]belu
2004-03-05 05:11 pm UTC (link)
Absolutely wonderful.

Was pointed here by [info]gruyere, who pays better attention to [info]metaquotes than I do.

(Reply to this)


[info]faethverity
2004-03-05 05:23 pm UTC (link)
Utterly delicious and delightful!

(Reply to this)


[info]jelymo
2004-03-05 11:45 pm UTC (link)
*poking in from [info]metaquotes*

YES! finally, some direction in life! i should forward this to my family. it might stop them from constantly asking, "Linguistics? What the #$@% can you do with Linguistics??"

i volunteer as executive director.

(Reply to this)

*laughs for a long while*
[info]kantol
2004-03-07 05:34 am UTC (link)
I can imagine a several-episode arc following determined linguists to find "the trace."

Unfortunately, monostratal theories like HPSG probably wouldn't make such a big splash in the TV world.

(Reply to this)


[info]sineala
2004-03-15 03:14 am UTC (link)
I found this post a little late, but I just wanted to say that I think this is the best thing ever. I was actually writing a very strange bad science fiction novel where things like that were major plot points, and a planet is destroyed by a bad structural description in a SPE-style rule. No, really. (My only excuse is that this was for NaNoWriMo, which does not so much value quality as it does quantity.) So, yeah, I'd watch Move Alpha.

(Reply to this)


[info]maradydd
2004-03-15 05:42 pm UTC (link)
So the Command Headquarters for Overt Movement of Syntax is located in Kentucky, right?

</innocent look>

(Reply to this) (Thread)

hmmm
(Anonymous)
2004-03-16 01:14 am UTC (link)
You noticed that too?

I might not have done the ancronym, but it was helpfully provided...

-- Ender, Duke_of_URL

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]maskedlinguist
2004-03-20 03:08 pm UTC (link)
I whole heartedly approve of such fine television choices. Move Alpha sounds FABULOUS.


--Mysterious Masked Linguist, AWAY!

(Reply to this)


[info]humanfemale
2004-03-20 03:57 pm UTC (link)
Very funny

(Reply to this)


[info]shaav
2004-03-20 04:34 pm UTC (link)
Awesome! :)

(Reply to this)


[info]millennial
2004-03-20 04:41 pm UTC (link)
Don't leave me hanging - WHAT HAPPENS NEXT???

(Reply to this)


[info]tungol
2004-03-20 07:26 pm UTC (link)
Beautiful! I'll hafta add it to my slowly-growing collection of linguistics-related humour.

(Reply to this)


[info]exrat
2004-03-23 07:30 am UTC (link)
*howling with maniacal laughter*

Glorious! Glorious! Encore! Encore!

(Reply to this)


[info]nottheshark
2004-03-23 03:12 pm UTC (link)
I bow before your wizardry...Move Alpha left me rolling. However, have you considered a series of movies perhaps? The sequel could be The Theta Criterion.
Can't you just see it, arguments breaking out about getting cases, wondering who's really assigning case..then it turns to the government, and someone trying to take over. Then a random group breaks off, called the Tired Of Political Intervention Collective (TOPIC), and quickly moves to the forefront of the campaign.

(Reply to this)


[info]ex_greymaide85
2004-04-04 07:10 pm UTC (link)
You mock us! You mock our chosen profession! Our passion! Our livelihoods!

Good for you ;)

(Reply to this)


[info]lasultrix
2004-04-30 10:24 am UTC (link)
You are a linguist who reads E2? I think I love you.

(Reply to this)

[dead]
[info]darthfox
2004-04-30 10:27 am UTC (link)
i'd comment on this, but i've died. phonetics lab: namby-pamby -- a minimal pair! [dying.] semantic street! [dying.]

OMG, implicit communication -- i am dead.

MOVE ALPHA: [dead and howling with laughter]

you. you. you've killed me!

(Reply to this)


[info]menin_aeide
2004-04-30 12:21 pm UTC (link)
*Jaw drops*

If I'd come across this before, I might have never left Linguistics for - ahem - Philosophy. Now, if I could only find something similar for Philosophy of Mind...

(Reply to this)


[info]ellen_fremedon
2004-04-30 10:12 pm UTC (link)
Brilliant.

(Reply to this)


[info]showergrrl
2004-05-06 09:27 am UTC (link)
Move Alpha is truly sexy.

(Reply to this)


[info]_swallow
2006-02-18 04:48 pm UTC (link)
Ahaha-- adorable.

(Reply to this)

oMLvkMwKEzCCpjgACND
(Anonymous)
2007-06-21 10:42 pm UTC (link)
a6a7d2745ee994377352f07b209ce0d6

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…